{"id": 8662, "created": "2008-08-29 00:16:02", "changetime": "2011-09-28 16:12:17", "last_pulled_from_trac": "2022-03-06 03:42:50.720441", "stage": "Unreviewed", "status": "closed", "component": "Documentation", "type": null, "severity": null, "version": "dev", "resolution": "fixed", "summary": "Overriding save() raises error when using Model.objects.create()", "description": "It seems that when over writing .save() (and maybe other default methods) you should be accepting *args, **kwargs and passing it along.\r\n\r\nI get an exception when using Model.objects.create():\r\n\r\nTraceback:\r\nFile \"/usr/local/lib/python2.5/site-packages/django/core/handlers/base.py\" in get_response\r\n  86.                 response = callback(request, *callback_args, **callback_kwargs)\r\nFile \"/home/pjs/site/netlandish/../netlandish/ccproc/views.py\" in order_process\r\n  41.                     form_data.get('custom', '')\r\nFile \"/home/pjs/site/netlandish/../netlandish/billing/helpers.py\" in build_sale\r\n  48.         ip=ip\r\nFile \"/usr/local/lib/python2.5/site-packages/django/db/models/manager.py\" in create\r\n  87.         return self.get_query_set().create(**kwargs)\r\nFile \"/usr/local/lib/python2.5/site-packages/django/db/models/query.py\" in create\r\n  311.         obj.save(force_insert=True)\r\n\r\nException Type: TypeError at /order/1027/\r\nException Value: save() got an unexpected keyword argument 'force_insert'\r\n\r\nMy custom .save() didn't have anything catching force_insert..\r\n\r\nThe docs don't show this is required.\r\n", "owner": "nobody", "reporter": "pjs", "keywords": null, "easy": 0, "has_patch": 0, "needs_better_patch": 0, "needs_tests": 0, "needs_docs": 0, "ui_ux": 0}
{"id": 8663, "created": "2008-08-29 01:07:00", "changetime": "2011-09-28 16:12:17", "last_pulled_from_trac": "2022-03-06 03:42:50.857469", "stage": "Design decision needed", "status": "closed", "component": "Forms", "type": null, "severity": null, "version": "dev", "resolution": "wontfix", "summary": "Inconsistencies/Bug in ModelForm", "description": "When a ModelForm is used to display a form for a Model, the fields defined with a choices option insert a \"-------\" value for the first option when the form is rendered.  If you override a field and manually specify the choices for a Select widget, this \"-------\" does not appear as the first choice.\r\n\r\n{{{\r\n# models.py\r\nfrom django.db import models\r\n\r\nMY_CHOICES = (\r\n  (0, 'Zero'),\r\n  (1, 'One'),\r\n)\r\n\r\nclass MyModel(models.Model):\r\n  my_field = models.IntegerField(choices=MY_CHOICES)\r\n}}}\r\n{{{\r\n# forms.py\r\nfrom django import forms\r\nfrom myapp.models import MyModel, MY_CHOICES\r\n\r\nclass MyModelForm(forms.ModelForm):\r\n    #my_field = forms.IntegerField(widget=forms.Select(choices=MY_CHOICES))\r\n    class Meta:\r\n        model = MyModel\r\n}}}\r\nView the HTML for the form with my_field commented out:\r\n{{{\r\n>>> from myapp.forms import MyModelForm\r\n>>> f = MyModelForm()\r\n>>> print f\r\n<tr><th><label for=\"id_my_field\">My field:</label></th><td><select name=\"my_field\" id=\"id_my_field\">\r\n<option value=\"\" selected=\"selected\">---------</option>\r\n<option value=\"0\">Zero</option>\r\n<option value=\"1\">One</option>\r\n</select></td></tr>\r\n}}}\r\n\r\nNow uncomment my_field in MyModelForm:\r\n{{{\r\n>>> from myapp.forms import MyModelForm\r\n>>> f = MyModelForm()\r\n>>> print f\r\n<tr><th><label for=\"id_my_field\">My field:</label></th><td><select name=\"my_field\" id=\"id_my_field\">\r\n<option value=\"0\">Zero</option>\r\n<option value=\"1\">One</option>\r\n</select></td></tr>\r\n}}}\r\n\r\nThis value doesn't appear in the 2nd case:\r\n<option value=\"\" selected=\"selected\">---------</option>\r\n\r\nSVN-8643", "owner": "nobody", "reporter": "lingrlongr", "keywords": "ModelForm forms", "easy": 0, "has_patch": 0, "needs_better_patch": 0, "needs_tests": 0, "needs_docs": 0, "ui_ux": 0}
{"id": 8664, "created": "2008-08-29 01:16:48", "changetime": "2011-09-28 16:12:17", "last_pulled_from_trac": "2022-03-06 03:42:50.990600", "stage": "Accepted", "status": "closed", "component": "Database layer (models, ORM)", "type": null, "severity": null, "version": "dev", "resolution": "fixed", "summary": "PhoneNumberField should be moved to django.contrib.localflavor.us", "description": "Like ''russelm'' [http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/8210#comment:4 has mentioned] in #8210 - `PhoneNumberField` should be moved to `django.contrib.localflavor.us`.\r\n\r\nAfter closing this ticket and #8210 there would be no references to `django.contrib.localflavor` from Django code (excluding `django/contrib/localflavor` directory itself).", "owner": "jacob", "reporter": "Piotr Lewandowski <django@icomputing.pl>", "keywords": "us localflavor", "easy": 0, "has_patch": 1, "needs_better_patch": 0, "needs_tests": 0, "needs_docs": 0, "ui_ux": 0}
{"id": 8665, "created": "2008-08-29 01:59:02", "changetime": "2011-09-28 16:12:17", "last_pulled_from_trac": "2022-03-06 03:42:51.134763", "stage": "Accepted", "status": "closed", "component": "Translations", "type": null, "severity": null, "version": "dev", "resolution": "fixed", "summary": "Update Polish translations", "description": "Changelog:\r\n  * Translate strings from [8679].\r\n  * Remove obsolete strings after `oldforms` removal.\r\n  * Remove some fuzziness.", "owner": "zgoda", "reporter": "Piotr Lewandowski <django@icomputing.pl>", "keywords": "pl polish", "easy": 0, "has_patch": 1, "needs_better_patch": 0, "needs_tests": 0, "needs_docs": 0, "ui_ux": 0}
{"id": 8666, "created": "2008-08-29 04:35:37", "changetime": "2008-08-29 05:01:56", "last_pulled_from_trac": "2022-03-06 03:42:51.289362", "stage": "Unreviewed", "status": "closed", "component": "Core (Management commands)", "type": null, "severity": null, "version": "dev", "resolution": "duplicate", "summary": "no startproject in django-admin.py", "description": "I just updated the checkout and now when I try to django-admin.py startproject, it says that this is an unknown command.  If I use help to list the available commands, startproject is not on the list.", "owner": "nobody", "reporter": "labtjd", "keywords": "startproject", "easy": 0, "has_patch": 0, "needs_better_patch": 0, "needs_tests": 0, "needs_docs": 0, "ui_ux": 0}
{"id": 8667, "created": "2008-08-29 06:20:52", "changetime": "2011-09-28 16:12:17", "last_pulled_from_trac": "2022-03-06 03:42:51.426809", "stage": "Unreviewed", "status": "closed", "component": "Documentation", "type": null, "severity": null, "version": "dev", "resolution": "duplicate", "summary": "Revive model inheritance documentation", "description": "So I don't forget: the model inheritance documentation seems to have been dropped during the docs merge. So we have to extract that out of the old models-api.txt. There was quite a bit of it, mostly all in one block towards the end of the file. Plus a couple of references earlier (e.g. in the related name section).", "owner": "nobody", "reporter": "mtredinnick", "keywords": null, "easy": 0, "has_patch": 0, "needs_better_patch": 0, "needs_tests": 0, "needs_docs": 0, "ui_ux": 0}
{"id": 8668, "created": "2008-08-29 06:52:18", "changetime": "2011-09-28 16:12:17", "last_pulled_from_trac": "2022-03-06 03:42:51.572172", "stage": "Unreviewed", "status": "closed", "component": "Database layer (models, ORM)", "type": null, "severity": null, "version": "dev", "resolution": "fixed", "summary": "Serializer regressions tests broken with MySQL", "description": "Looks like [8676] had some side-effects. The serializer regressions tests (`serializers_regress`) are broken on MySQL and worked before it.\r\n\r\nI haven't looked any further than just bisecting down to the problem commit (I thought it was something else I'd done tonight). But if I don't file this now, there'll be a ticket opened in the morning by the Florida Testing Society. Just saving some time by doing it now.", "owner": "nobody", "reporter": "mtredinnick", "keywords": null, "easy": 0, "has_patch": 0, "needs_better_patch": 0, "needs_tests": 0, "needs_docs": 0, "ui_ux": 0}
{"id": 8669, "created": "2008-08-29 08:15:02", "changetime": "2011-09-28 16:12:17", "last_pulled_from_trac": "2022-03-06 03:42:51.725361", "stage": "Accepted", "status": "closed", "component": "Database layer (models, ORM)", "type": null, "severity": null, "version": "dev", "resolution": "fixed", "summary": "All remaining create() methods also force an insert (continuation of r8670)", "description": "#8419 / [8670] forced an SQL insert in the main create() and get_or_create() methods, preventing data loss from overwriting existing data - thanks Malcolm!\r\n\r\nAll other get_or_create() methods end up calling back to the main get_or_create().\r\n\r\nHowever, there are a few extra create() methods which don't call back to the main create() - this patch ensures that those also force an insert, so cannot overwrite existing data.\r\n\r\nExtra methods found via \"find django -name '*.py' | xargs grep -F 'def create('\" and \"find django -name '*.py' | xargs grep -F 'def get_or_create('\"", "owner": "nobody", "reporter": "Richard Davies <richard.davies@elastichosts.com>", "keywords": null, "easy": 0, "has_patch": 1, "needs_better_patch": 0, "needs_tests": 0, "needs_docs": 0, "ui_ux": 0}
{"id": 8670, "created": "2008-08-29 08:23:33", "changetime": "2010-11-17 04:46:13", "last_pulled_from_trac": "2022-03-06 03:42:51.865743", "stage": "Accepted", "status": "closed", "component": "contrib.admin", "type": null, "severity": null, "version": "dev", "resolution": "fixed", "summary": "auth add_view should accept extra_context", "description": null, "owner": "nobody", "reporter": "sorl", "keywords": null, "easy": 0, "has_patch": 1, "needs_better_patch": 0, "needs_tests": 0, "needs_docs": 0, "ui_ux": 0}
{"id": 8671, "created": "2008-08-29 08:44:10", "changetime": "2008-08-29 16:57:23", "last_pulled_from_trac": "2022-03-06 03:42:52.025743", "stage": "Unreviewed", "status": "closed", "component": "Core (Other)", "type": null, "severity": null, "version": "dev", "resolution": "worksforme", "summary": "django.views.static.serve shoud have APPEND_SLASH=True", "description": "When running debug server with some .js .css file using django.views.static.serve while 'show_indexes': True, example, navigate to\r\nhttp://127.0.0.1:8000/images\r\nwhen click a 1.jpg listed bellow, I was navigate to\r\nhttp://127.0.0.1:8000/1.jpg\r\n\r\nBut what I desired URL is\r\nhttp://127.0.0.1:8000/images/1.jpg\r\n\r\nThe problem is we should set APPEND_SLASH=True as default here in django.views.static.serve", "owner": "nobody", "reporter": "est", "keywords": "static", "easy": 0, "has_patch": 0, "needs_better_patch": 0, "needs_tests": 0, "needs_docs": 0, "ui_ux": 0}
{"id": 8672, "created": "2008-08-29 09:16:47", "changetime": "2009-02-25 19:51:44", "last_pulled_from_trac": "2022-03-06 03:42:52.169418", "stage": "Design decision needed", "status": "closed", "component": "Database layer (models, ORM)", "type": null, "severity": null, "version": "dev", "resolution": "wontfix", "summary": "ModelForm.save() should implement force_insert and force_update, like Model.save()", "description": "[8267] added the ability to force an SQL insert (or force an update) via a model's save() method.\r\n\r\nThe same force_insert and force_update flags should be supported in a modelform's save() method.\r\n\r\nThese flags enable better control over some edge cases - e.g. force_insert will prevent overwriting existing data if the same primary key has accidentally been specified.", "owner": "nobody", "reporter": "Richard Davies <richard.davies@elastichosts.com>", "keywords": null, "easy": 0, "has_patch": 1, "needs_better_patch": 0, "needs_tests": 0, "needs_docs": 0, "ui_ux": 0}
{"id": 8673, "created": "2008-08-29 09:17:31", "changetime": "2011-09-28 16:12:17", "last_pulled_from_trac": "2022-03-06 03:42:52.325970", "stage": "Accepted", "status": "closed", "component": "File uploads/storage", "type": null, "severity": null, "version": "dev", "resolution": "fixed", "summary": "Missing import in django.core.files.move", "description": "In [8493] the copied `copystat` in django.core.files.move uses `stat.S_IMODE`, but `stat` is not imported.\r\n", "owner": "nobody", "reporter": "vung", "keywords": null, "easy": 0, "has_patch": 1, "needs_better_patch": 0, "needs_tests": 0, "needs_docs": 0, "ui_ux": 0}
{"id": 8674, "created": "2008-08-29 09:38:51", "changetime": "2011-09-28 16:12:17", "last_pulled_from_trac": "2022-03-06 03:42:52.508199", "stage": "Unreviewed", "status": "closed", "component": "contrib.admin", "type": null, "severity": null, "version": "dev", "resolution": "duplicate", "summary": "OneToOne Fields display problem in admin gui", "description": "This bug is for SVN 8696.\r\n\r\nI created the following simple !OneToOneField model:\r\n{{{\r\nclass Man(models.Model):\r\n    name = models.CharField(max_length=10)\r\n    def __unicode__(self):\r\n        return self.name\r\n\r\nclass Woman(models.Model):\r\n    name = models.CharField(max_length=10)\r\n    man = models.OneToOneField(Man)\r\n    def __unicode__(self):\r\n        return self.name\r\n}}}\r\n\r\ne.g., a woman is married to one man.\r\n\r\nIf I register both models with admin.site.register and start editing them via administration I can add woman to man 1:1 relations, however if I start editing my womens objects again I get \"--------\" instead of my related man object shown in the select box. Within the database the OneToOneField data looks ok.\r\n", "owner": "nobody", "reporter": "nekron", "keywords": "OneToOne", "easy": 0, "has_patch": 0, "needs_better_patch": 0, "needs_tests": 0, "needs_docs": 0, "ui_ux": 0}
{"id": 8675, "created": "2008-08-29 09:44:21", "changetime": "2008-08-29 09:52:49", "last_pulled_from_trac": "2022-03-06 03:42:52.683218", "stage": "Unreviewed", "status": "closed", "component": "Documentation", "type": null, "severity": null, "version": "dev", "resolution": "duplicate", "summary": "File storage - Storage objects example does not work", "description": "The example at the beginning of\r\n\r\nhttp://www.djangoproject.com/documentation/files/#storage-objects\r\n\r\ndoes not work.\r\n\r\n{{{\r\n>>> from django.core.files.storage import default_storage\r\n\r\n>>> path = default_storage.save('/path/to/file', 'new content')\r\n\r\n}}}\r\n\r\nwill give you an error:\r\n\r\n{{{\r\n<type 'exceptions.AttributeError'>: 'str' object has no attribute 'chunks' \r\n}}}\r\n\r\nThe way to fix is to pass ContentFile('new content') from django.core.files.base. In fact, other examples should be double checked if they expect a string or a ContentFile-like object.\r\n\r\nSee http://groups.google.com/group/django-users/browse_thread/thread/230a8601a4839bd9 for more information.\r\n", "owner": "nobody", "reporter": "whiskybar", "keywords": null, "easy": 0, "has_patch": 0, "needs_better_patch": 0, "needs_tests": 0, "needs_docs": 0, "ui_ux": 0}
{"id": 8676, "created": "2008-08-29 10:24:03", "changetime": "2008-08-29 10:33:05", "last_pulled_from_trac": "2022-03-06 03:42:52.830715", "stage": "Unreviewed", "status": "closed", "component": "Uncategorized", "type": null, "severity": null, "version": "dev", "resolution": "wontfix", "summary": "BooleanField says value required if False", "description": "The BooleanField should accept False values and not raise the required error. Here is a diff from the http://code.djangoproject.com/svn/django/tags/notable_moments/1.0-beta-1 branch. The problem is in trunk too.\r\n\r\n{{{\r\nIndex: django/forms/fields.py\r\n===================================================================\r\n--- django/forms/fields.py\t(revision 8696)\r\n+++ django/forms/fields.py\t(working copy)\r\n@@ -569,9 +569,9 @@\r\n         if value == 'False':\r\n             value = False\r\n         else:\r\n-            value = bool(value)\r\n+            value = value and True or None\r\n         super(BooleanField, self).clean(value)\r\n-        if not value and self.required:\r\n+        if value is None and self.required:\r\n             raise ValidationError(self.error_messages['required'])\r\n         return value\r\n \r\n}}}", "owner": "nobody", "reporter": "dobee", "keywords": "forms", "easy": 0, "has_patch": 1, "needs_better_patch": 0, "needs_tests": 0, "needs_docs": 0, "ui_ux": 0}
{"id": 8677, "created": "2008-08-29 10:28:54", "changetime": "2008-08-29 10:55:01", "last_pulled_from_trac": "2022-03-06 03:42:52.968880", "stage": "Unreviewed", "status": "closed", "component": "contrib.admin", "type": null, "severity": null, "version": "dev", "resolution": "duplicate", "summary": "admin redirect when \"save\" doesn't account for previous querystring (e.g: search)", "description": "When saving a model edited coming from a list page where a search was performed, (i.e. with ?q=<search_text>), admin redirects to the list page without the querystring.\r\nIf the user is editing a series of common objects within a big list, it is forced to perform the same search again and again with every 'save'.", "owner": "nobody", "reporter": "gogna", "keywords": null, "easy": 0, "has_patch": 0, "needs_better_patch": 0, "needs_tests": 0, "needs_docs": 0, "ui_ux": 0}
{"id": 8678, "created": "2008-08-29 11:04:50", "changetime": "2009-02-25 19:51:44", "last_pulled_from_trac": "2022-03-06 03:42:53.128356", "stage": "Unreviewed", "status": "closed", "component": "contrib.auth", "type": null, "severity": null, "version": "dev", "resolution": "invalid", "summary": "errors with custom profile", "description": "if profile model is placed somewhere else than in root dir django has 'ValueError at /users/profil/ too many values to unpack' in /home/grono3/python/django/contrib/auth/models.py in get_profile, line 292", "owner": "nobody", "reporter": "slowik", "keywords": null, "easy": 0, "has_patch": 0, "needs_better_patch": 0, "needs_tests": 0, "needs_docs": 0, "ui_ux": 0}
{"id": 8679, "created": "2008-08-29 11:42:11", "changetime": "2011-09-28 16:12:17", "last_pulled_from_trac": "2022-03-06 03:42:53.287009", "stage": "Accepted", "status": "closed", "component": "Documentation", "type": null, "severity": null, "version": "dev", "resolution": "fixed", "summary": "Custom save() method signature needs to be fixed in some tests and docs after changeset 8670", "description": "Changeset r8670 change the way create() and get_or_create() methods work. Examples in documentation does not reflect this change yet.", "owner": "nobody", "reporter": "Uninen", "keywords": "documentation, save, create, get_or_create", "easy": 0, "has_patch": 1, "needs_better_patch": 0, "needs_tests": 0, "needs_docs": 0, "ui_ux": 0}
{"id": 8680, "created": "2008-08-29 12:32:57", "changetime": "2011-09-28 16:12:17", "last_pulled_from_trac": "2022-03-06 03:42:53.414224", "stage": "Unreviewed", "status": "closed", "component": "GIS", "type": null, "severity": null, "version": "dev", "resolution": "fixed", "summary": "gis may break Python help() modules command", "description": "As reported here: http://groups.google.com/group/django-users/browse_thread/thread/47529751d7a82fee?hl=en#\r\n\r\nThis is similar to #5743 and perhaps could use a similar approach to fix?", "owner": "nobody", "reporter": "kmtracey", "keywords": null, "easy": 0, "has_patch": 0, "needs_better_patch": 0, "needs_tests": 0, "needs_docs": 0, "ui_ux": 0}
{"id": 8681, "created": "2008-08-29 12:34:35", "changetime": "2009-02-25 20:58:46", "last_pulled_from_trac": "2022-03-06 03:42:53.790898", "stage": "Unreviewed", "status": "closed", "component": "Core (Other)", "type": null, "severity": null, "version": "dev", "resolution": "invalid", "summary": "Uncaught exception in django/db/models/base.py: UnboundLocalError", "description": "In source:django/trunk/django/db/models/base.py as of [8696], lines 197-203:\r\n\r\n{{{\r\n#!python\r\n        for field in fields_iter:\r\n            rel_obj = None\r\n            if kwargs:\r\n                if isinstance(field.rel, ManyToOneRel):\r\n                    try:\r\n                        # Assume object instance was passed in.\r\n                        rel_obj = kwargs.pop(field.name)\r\n}}}\r\n\r\nIf kwargs[field.name] is None, rel_obj is set to None, val is not set at all, and we get an UnboundLocalError at line 226. Context: the model in question had a OneToOneField whose primary_key was not yet set/was set to None and a save() was attempted.\r\n\r\nSee stacktrace at dpaste: http://dpaste.com/74655/\r\n\r\nEither we need to have a better error-message here, for instance mentioning what field is the problem and how it can be fixed, or the code needs to do something sensible.", "owner": "nobody", "reporter": "HM <hanne.moa@gmail.com>", "keywords": "models, onetoonefield", "easy": 0, "has_patch": 0, "needs_better_patch": 0, "needs_tests": 0, "needs_docs": 0, "ui_ux": 0}
{"id": 8682, "created": "2008-08-29 12:39:15", "changetime": "2008-08-29 15:50:16", "last_pulled_from_trac": "2022-03-06 03:42:53.961792", "stage": "Unreviewed", "status": "closed", "component": "contrib.admin", "type": null, "severity": null, "version": "dev", "resolution": "invalid", "summary": "Admin ordering works incorrectly if ModelAdmin.ordering has several fields, and one of them is an another Model field", "description": "If I create two dependent models, and ask the admin interface to order instances of the dependent Model based on the field of the base Model AND on its own field, the secondary ordering is lost. See minimalistic example:\r\n\r\n{{{\r\n#!python\r\n\r\nclass Foo(models.Model):\r\n\tis_active = models.BooleanField(default=True)\r\n\r\nclass Bar(models.Model):\r\n\tfoo = models.OneToOneField(Foo, primary_key=True)\r\n\tname = models.CharField(max_length=100)\r\n\t\r\n\tdef __unicode__(self):\r\n\t\treturn \"%s, %s\" % (self.name, \"active\" if self.foo.is_active else \"inactive\")\r\n\r\n# ...\r\n\r\nclass BarAdmin(admin.ModelAdmin):\r\n\tlist_display = ('name',)\r\n\tordering = ('-foo__is_active', 'name')\r\n\r\nadmin.site.register(Bar, BarAdmin)\r\n}}}\r\n\r\n{{{\r\ninsert into app_foo set is_active=1;\r\ninsert into app_foo set is_active=1;\r\ninsert into app_foo set is_active=1;\r\ninsert into app_bar values (1,'aaaa');\r\ninsert into app_bar values (1,'ccc');\r\ninsert into app_bar values (1,'bbb');\r\n}}}\r\n\r\nIf we run a manual query, it works as expected:\r\n{{{\r\n>>> Bar.objects.order_by('-foo__is_active', 'name')\r\n[<Bar: aaaa, active>, <Bar: bbb, active>, <Bar: ccc, active>]\r\n}}}\r\n\r\nHowever, the admin page at http://my.site/admin/app/bar/ would display:\r\n{{{\r\naaa\r\nccc\r\nbbb\r\n}}}\r\n\r\nwhich means the ordering was lost.\r\n\r\nIf both fields are in the same model, everything works fine.\r\n\r\nDjango version is [8696].", "owner": "nobody", "reporter": "semenov", "keywords": "newforms-admin admin ordering", "easy": 0, "has_patch": 0, "needs_better_patch": 0, "needs_tests": 0, "needs_docs": 0, "ui_ux": 0}
{"id": 8683, "created": "2008-08-29 12:45:21", "changetime": "2011-09-28 16:12:17", "last_pulled_from_trac": "2022-03-06 03:42:54.127760", "stage": "Accepted", "status": "closed", "component": "Database layer (models, ORM)", "type": null, "severity": null, "version": "dev", "resolution": "fixed", "summary": "NameError caused by typo in DateQuerySet._setup_query", "description": "In `!DateQuerySet._setup_query` there is an `assert` whose second expression refers to a non-existent name (\"`field_name`\").  I modified it to be \"`field.name`\"\r\n", "owner": "mtredinnick", "reporter": "vung", "keywords": null, "easy": 0, "has_patch": 0, "needs_better_patch": 0, "needs_tests": 0, "needs_docs": 0, "ui_ux": 0}
{"id": 8684, "created": "2008-08-29 13:41:05", "changetime": "2008-08-31 23:22:45", "last_pulled_from_trac": "2022-03-06 03:42:54.301351", "stage": "Unreviewed", "status": "closed", "component": "contrib.admin", "type": null, "severity": null, "version": null, "resolution": "invalid", "summary": "Adding custom (succes/failure) messages to the admin site", "description": "When you for example save a new object in the admin site this small yellow bar on top will appear telling you \"everything's saved correctly\".\r\nIt would be very useful if you were able to create your own custom messages here.", "owner": "nobody", "reporter": "metzeltiger", "keywords": "message, notification", "easy": 0, "has_patch": 0, "needs_better_patch": 0, "needs_tests": 0, "needs_docs": 0, "ui_ux": 0}
{"id": 8685, "created": "2008-08-29 13:46:42", "changetime": "2008-08-29 17:49:11", "last_pulled_from_trac": "2022-03-06 03:42:54.473038", "stage": "Unreviewed", "status": "closed", "component": "Translations", "type": null, "severity": null, "version": "dev", "resolution": "fixed", "summary": "Portuguese translation patch", "description": "This is a Portuguese translation update.\r\nI'm sending the patch and the .po files, just in case.", "owner": "nobody", "reporter": "nmariz", "keywords": null, "easy": 0, "has_patch": 1, "needs_better_patch": 0, "needs_tests": 0, "needs_docs": 0, "ui_ux": 0}
{"id": 8686, "created": "2008-08-29 15:01:49", "changetime": "2009-02-25 20:59:13", "last_pulled_from_trac": "2022-03-06 03:42:54.661969", "stage": "Unreviewed", "status": "closed", "component": "Documentation", "type": null, "severity": null, "version": "dev", "resolution": "invalid", "summary": "Example of permissions to edit/delete a particular object", "description": "It would be nice to give an example of permissions to edit/delete/etc. a particular object, since this is a common scenario. ", "owner": "nobody", "reporter": "anonymous", "keywords": null, "easy": 0, "has_patch": 0, "needs_better_patch": 0, "needs_tests": 0, "needs_docs": 0, "ui_ux": 0}
{"id": 8687, "created": "2008-08-29 15:25:18", "changetime": "2011-09-28 16:12:17", "last_pulled_from_trac": "2022-03-06 03:42:54.820034", "stage": "Unreviewed", "status": "closed", "component": "Metasystem", "type": null, "severity": null, "version": "dev", "resolution": "fixed", "summary": "NameError when validating m2m models", "description": "Found this while monkeying around with pyflakes: `'django/core/management/validation.py:134: undefined name 'rel_from'`\r\n\r\n", "owner": "nobody", "reporter": "vung", "keywords": null, "easy": 0, "has_patch": 1, "needs_better_patch": 0, "needs_tests": 0, "needs_docs": 0, "ui_ux": 0}
{"id": 8688, "created": "2008-08-29 16:22:46", "changetime": "2008-10-06 08:44:41", "last_pulled_from_trac": "2022-03-06 03:42:54.994220", "stage": "Unreviewed", "status": "closed", "component": "Documentation", "type": null, "severity": null, "version": "dev", "resolution": "fixed", "summary": "Small change on documentation for static media serving", "description": "I'd like to suggest a small change to the documentation on http://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/howto/static-files/#limiting-use-to-debug-true which would be adding a variable like settings.MEDIA_DEVELOPMENT_ROOT instead of using an hardcoded path on the urls.py for development purposes. This is a much better way for different developers to work on the same project with only different settings.py files.", "owner": "nobody", "reporter": "trodrigues", "keywords": "static media files", "easy": 0, "has_patch": 1, "needs_better_patch": 0, "needs_tests": 0, "needs_docs": 0, "ui_ux": 0}
{"id": 8689, "created": "2008-08-29 16:32:44", "changetime": "2011-09-28 16:12:17", "last_pulled_from_trac": "2022-03-06 03:42:55.159257", "stage": "Accepted", "status": "closed", "component": "Translations", "type": null, "severity": null, "version": "dev", "resolution": "fixed", "summary": "Update russian translation", "description": "Update Russian translation django.po and djangojs.po.", "owner": "nobody", "reporter": "greg", "keywords": "russian translation", "easy": 0, "has_patch": 0, "needs_better_patch": 0, "needs_tests": 0, "needs_docs": 0, "ui_ux": 0}
{"id": 8691, "created": "2008-08-29 17:17:39", "changetime": "2008-08-29 17:23:27", "last_pulled_from_trac": "2022-03-06 03:42:55.508704", "stage": "Unreviewed", "status": "closed", "component": "Uncategorized", "type": null, "severity": null, "version": "dev", "resolution": "wontfix", "summary": "link to beta/dev doc in main documentation page", "description": "hi, you might want to add a link to beta documentation (http://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/) in the main documentation page (http://www.djangoproject.com/documentation/) at the bottom of the page with the other versions.\r\n\r\nlookin quite nice otherwise! thx much ;)", "owner": "nobody", "reporter": "mamat", "keywords": null, "easy": 0, "has_patch": 0, "needs_better_patch": 0, "needs_tests": 0, "needs_docs": 0, "ui_ux": 0}
{"id": 8692, "created": "2008-08-29 17:34:53", "changetime": "2011-09-28 16:12:17", "last_pulled_from_trac": "2022-03-06 03:42:55.644970", "stage": "Unreviewed", "status": "closed", "component": "Uncategorized", "type": null, "severity": null, "version": "dev", "resolution": "fixed", "summary": "Add myself to AUTHORS", "description": "Add myself to authors", "owner": "brosner", "reporter": "bastih", "keywords": null, "easy": 0, "has_patch": 0, "needs_better_patch": 0, "needs_tests": 0, "needs_docs": 0, "ui_ux": 0}
{"id": 8693, "created": "2008-08-29 18:25:21", "changetime": "2011-09-28 16:12:17", "last_pulled_from_trac": "2022-03-06 03:42:55.782313", "stage": "Accepted", "status": "closed", "component": "Documentation", "type": null, "severity": null, "version": "dev", "resolution": "fixed", "summary": "docs: missing blank line causes uneven rendering", "description": "The `null` model field option is rendered in bold fonts here http://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/topics/db/models/#field-options, fiving it a different appearance from the rest of the options.\r\n", "owner": "nobody", "reporter": "ramiro", "keywords": null, "easy": 0, "has_patch": 0, "needs_better_patch": 0, "needs_tests": 0, "needs_docs": 0, "ui_ux": 0}
{"id": 8694, "created": "2008-08-29 18:39:15", "changetime": "2011-09-28 16:12:17", "last_pulled_from_trac": "2022-03-06 03:42:55.931624", "stage": "Accepted", "status": "closed", "component": "contrib.admin", "type": null, "severity": null, "version": "dev", "resolution": "fixed", "summary": "Change page for model with a OneToOne field doesn't display related field value", "description": "This ticket is an attempt to state one simple re-creatable problem so as to simplify the tangled issues raised in #8241 and #8562.\r\n\r\nGiven these models:\r\n\r\n{{{\r\nfrom django.db import models\r\n\r\n# Create your models here.\r\nclass Parent(models.Model):\r\n    name = models.CharField(max_length=50)\r\n    def __unicode__(self):\r\n        return self.name\r\n\r\nclass Child(models.Model):\r\n    name = models.CharField(max_length=50)\r\n    parent = models.OneToOneField(Parent, primary_key=True)\r\n    def __unicode__(self):\r\n        return '%s, child of %s' % (self.name, unicode(self.parent))\r\n\r\n}}}\r\n\r\nand this admin.py:\r\n\r\n{{{\r\nfrom django.contrib import admin\r\nfrom inlinet1.models import Parent, Child\r\n\r\nclass ParentAdmin(admin.ModelAdmin):\r\n    list_display = ('name',)\r\n\r\nclass ChildAdmin(admin.ModelAdmin):\r\n    list_display = ('name', 'parent',)\r\n\r\nadmin.site.register(Parent, ParentAdmin)\r\nadmin.site.register(Child, ChildAdmin)\r\n\r\n}}}\r\n\r\nFrom the admin:\r\n\r\n1 - Select Add on Parents, fill in name, save\r\n\r\n2 - Select Add on Childs, fill in name, select parent from 1, select \"Save and continue editing\"\r\n\r\nOn re-display of the change page, the select box widget for 'Parent' will be set to '-----'.  This was introduced by the fix for #7888 and may be fixed by one of the patches on #8241, Brian understands that better than I.", "owner": "brosner", "reporter": "kmtracey", "keywords": null, "easy": 0, "has_patch": 0, "needs_better_patch": 0, "needs_tests": 0, "needs_docs": 0, "ui_ux": 0}
{"id": 8695, "created": "2008-08-29 18:47:42", "changetime": "2011-09-28 16:12:17", "last_pulled_from_trac": "2022-03-06 03:42:56.077369", "stage": "Accepted", "status": "closed", "component": "contrib.admin", "type": null, "severity": null, "version": "dev", "resolution": "fixed", "summary": "KeyError on save of model with inline-edited OneToOne sharing primary key", "description": "This ticket is an attempt to state one simple re-creatable problem so as to simplify the tangled issues raised in #8241 and #8562.\r\n\r\nGiven these models:\r\n\r\n{{{\r\nfrom django.db import models\r\n\r\n# Create your models here.\r\nclass Parent(models.Model):\r\n    name = models.CharField(max_length=50)\r\n    def __unicode__(self):\r\n        return self.name\r\n\r\nclass Child(models.Model):\r\n    name = models.CharField(max_length=50)\r\n    parent = models.OneToOneField(Parent, primary_key=True)\r\n    def __unicode__(self):\r\n        return '%s, child of %s' % (self.name, unicode(self.parent))\r\n\r\n}}}\r\n\r\nand this admin.py:\r\n\r\n{{{\r\nfrom django.contrib import admin\r\nfrom inlinet1.models import Parent, Child\r\n\r\nclass ChildInline(admin.StackedInline):\r\n    model = Child\r\n    max_num = 1\r\n    \r\nclass ParentAdmin(admin.ModelAdmin):\r\n    inlines = [ChildInline]\r\n    list_display = ('name',)\r\n\r\nclass ChildAdmin(admin.ModelAdmin):\r\n    list_display = ('name', 'parent',)\r\n\r\nadmin.site.register(Parent, ParentAdmin)\r\nadmin.site.register(Child, ChildAdmin)\r\n\r\n}}}\r\n\r\nFrom the admin:\r\n\r\n1 - Select Add on Parents, fill in parent name & inline-edited child name, select \"Save and continue editing\"\r\n\r\n2 - Select \"Save and continue editing\" again and you'll get an exception:\r\n\r\n{{{\r\nEnvironment:\r\n\r\nRequest Method: POST\r\nRequest URL: http://localhost:8888/admin/inlinet1/parent/3/\r\nDjango Version: 1.0-beta_2-SVN-8712\r\nPython Version: 2.5.1\r\nInstalled Applications:\r\n['django.contrib.auth',\r\n 'django.contrib.contenttypes',\r\n 'django.contrib.sessions',\r\n 'django.contrib.sites',\r\n 'django.contrib.admin',\r\n 'django.contrib.redirects',\r\n 'playground.inlinet1']\r\nInstalled Middleware:\r\n('django.middleware.common.CommonMiddleware',\r\n 'django.contrib.sessions.middleware.SessionMiddleware',\r\n 'django.contrib.auth.middleware.AuthenticationMiddleware',\r\n 'django.middleware.doc.XViewMiddleware',\r\n 'django.middleware.transaction.TransactionMiddleware')\r\n\r\n\r\nTraceback:\r\nFile \"/home/kmt/tmp/django/trunk/django/core/handlers/base.py\" in get_response\r\n  86.                 response = callback(request, *callback_args, **callback_kwargs)\r\nFile \"/home/kmt/tmp/django/trunk/django/contrib/admin/sites.py\" in root\r\n  173.                 return self.model_page(request, *url.split('/', 2))\r\nFile \"/home/kmt/tmp/django/trunk/django/views/decorators/cache.py\" in _wrapped_view_func\r\n  44.         response = view_func(request, *args, **kwargs)\r\nFile \"/home/kmt/tmp/django/trunk/django/contrib/admin/sites.py\" in model_page\r\n  192.         return admin_obj(request, rest_of_url)\r\nFile \"/home/kmt/tmp/django/trunk/django/contrib/admin/options.py\" in __call__\r\n  196.             return self.change_view(request, unquote(url))\r\nFile \"/home/kmt/tmp/django/trunk/django/db/transaction.py\" in _commit_on_success\r\n  238.                 res = func(*args, **kw)\r\nFile \"/home/kmt/tmp/django/trunk/django/contrib/admin/options.py\" in change_view\r\n  588.                     self.save_formset(request, form, formset, change=True)\r\nFile \"/home/kmt/tmp/django/trunk/django/contrib/admin/options.py\" in save_formset\r\n  378.         formset.save()\r\nFile \"/home/kmt/tmp/django/trunk/django/forms/models.py\" in save\r\n  280.         return self.save_existing_objects(commit) + self.save_new_objects(commit)\r\nFile \"/home/kmt/tmp/django/trunk/django/forms/models.py\" in save_existing_objects\r\n  294.             obj = existing_objects[form.cleaned_data[self.model._meta.pk.attname]]\r\n\r\nException Type: KeyError at /admin/inlinet1/parent/3/\r\nException Value: 'parent_id'\r\n\r\n}}}\r\n\r\nThe changes to `add_fields` in the patches for #8562 fix the error, but perhaps not in the correct fashion.", "owner": "brosner", "reporter": "kmtracey", "keywords": null, "easy": 0, "has_patch": 0, "needs_better_patch": 0, "needs_tests": 0, "needs_docs": 0, "ui_ux": 0}
{"id": 8696, "created": "2008-08-29 19:33:15", "changetime": "2011-09-28 16:12:17", "last_pulled_from_trac": "2022-03-06 03:42:56.253769", "stage": "Accepted", "status": "closed", "component": "Documentation", "type": null, "severity": null, "version": "1.0-beta", "resolution": "fixed", "summary": "Online docs using incorrect apostrophe character", "description": "The online docs at http://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/intro/tutorial02/#intro-tutorial02\r\nare using incorrect characters for apostrophes. The example url patterns\r\n{{{\r\nurlpatterns = patterns(\u2018\u2019,\r\n    # Example:\r\n    # (r\u2019^{{ project_name }}/\u2019, include(\u2018{{ project_name }}.foo.urls\u2019)),\r\n\r\n    # Uncomment the next line to enable admin documentation:\r\n    # (r\u2019^admin/doc/\u2019, include(\u2018django.contrib.admindocs.urls\u2019)),\r\n\r\n    # Uncomment the next line to enable the admin:\r\n    (r\u2019^admin/(.*)\u2019, admin.site.root),\r\n)\r\n}}}\r\ncannot be cut and pasted because they are using \u2019 instead of ' to delimit their strings. You'll notice that the code color-coding is incorrect. A search for \".. parsed-literal::\" in the source turned up five hits; these four files show this problem with delimiters:\r\n{{{\r\ndocs/intro/tutorial02.txt\r\ndocs/howto/deployment/modpython.txt\r\ndocs/howto/custom-template-tags.txt\r\ndocs/howto/apache-auth.txt\r\n}}}\r\nIt looks like parsed-literal is the wrong tag to use here.", "owner": "jacob", "reporter": "jjackson", "keywords": null, "easy": 0, "has_patch": 1, "needs_better_patch": 0, "needs_tests": 0, "needs_docs": 0, "ui_ux": 0}
{"id": 8697, "created": "2008-08-29 21:03:34", "changetime": "2011-09-28 16:12:17", "last_pulled_from_trac": "2022-03-06 03:42:56.414327", "stage": "Unreviewed", "status": "closed", "component": "Translations", "type": null, "severity": null, "version": "dev", "resolution": "fixed", "summary": "Norwegian translation ready for 1.0", "description": "The Norwegian translation should now be ready for 1.0! All the localflavours are now translated (where applicable) + the new comments framework.", "owner": "nobody", "reporter": "jonklo", "keywords": "norwegian", "easy": 0, "has_patch": 1, "needs_better_patch": 0, "needs_tests": 0, "needs_docs": 0, "ui_ux": 0}
{"id": 8698, "created": "2008-08-29 21:54:11", "changetime": "2011-09-28 16:12:17", "last_pulled_from_trac": "2022-03-06 03:42:56.607366", "stage": "Unreviewed", "status": "closed", "component": "Documentation", "type": null, "severity": null, "version": "dev", "resolution": "fixed", "summary": "Middleware Documentation still refers to CacheMiddleware", "description": "On the Cache documentation page, it says you have to use UpdateCacheMiddleware and FetchFromCacheMiddleware instead of the older CacheMiddleware. However the Middleware documentation only mentions CacheMiddleware and does not discuss the two new middlewares.", "owner": "nobody", "reporter": "anonymous", "keywords": "middleware, cache", "easy": 0, "has_patch": 1, "needs_better_patch": 0, "needs_tests": 0, "needs_docs": 0, "ui_ux": 0}
{"id": 8699, "created": "2008-08-29 23:19:37", "changetime": "2008-08-30 03:50:26", "last_pulled_from_trac": "2022-03-06 03:42:56.757397", "stage": "Unreviewed", "status": "closed", "component": "Translations", "type": null, "severity": null, "version": "dev", "resolution": "fixed", "summary": "Translated post-string freeze strings for Hungarian", "description": "See the attached diff. Sorry for the cruft, but a large number of comment lines were messed up during the POT generation, and others are just KBabel's stupidity.", "owner": "nobody", "reporter": "szilveszter", "keywords": null, "easy": 0, "has_patch": 1, "needs_better_patch": 0, "needs_tests": 0, "needs_docs": 0, "ui_ux": 0}
{"id": 8700, "created": "2008-08-29 23:43:38", "changetime": "2011-09-28 16:12:17", "last_pulled_from_trac": "2022-03-06 03:42:56.915977", "stage": "Ready for checkin", "status": "closed", "component": "Documentation", "type": null, "severity": null, "version": "dev", "resolution": "fixed", "summary": "Localflavor example code broken", "description": "The doc fix in [7961] was reverted by [7967].", "owner": "nobody", "reporter": "mattmcc", "keywords": null, "easy": 0, "has_patch": 1, "needs_better_patch": 0, "needs_tests": 0, "needs_docs": 0, "ui_ux": 0}
{"id": 8690, "created": "2008-08-29 17:11:42", "changetime": "2014-10-20 18:13:24", "last_pulled_from_trac": "2022-03-06 03:42:55.330172", "stage": "Accepted", "status": "closed", "component": "contrib.formtools", "type": "New feature", "severity": "Normal", "version": "dev", "resolution": "fixed", "summary": "FormPreview should pass request to parse_params", "description": "It would be very useful to have request data in parse_params. The example given is to capture something like a user_id, but the main thing I would want to do here is to verify that the current user has permission to access the URL given. Of course, adding a parameter breaks backwards compatibility, so this is a similar request to #7222.", "owner": "nobody", "reporter": "bthomas", "keywords": "formpreview", "easy": 0, "has_patch": 1, "needs_better_patch": 1, "needs_tests": 1, "needs_docs": 1, "ui_ux": 0}